Too bad, as several of their techs thought highly of the machine. Leave this field blank. Location: The East Coast of England. Yes, it is slightly warm sounding only a littlebut in a good way -- and it still packs a lot of detail too. Related Latest Galleries Recommended.
This means, unfortunately, that those senior Head-Fiers who insist that "the The Marantz SAS2 and the Esoteric SA are both rather. Your interpretation appears more a reflection of your own . I wonder if anyone has compared the Marantz SAS2 to Esoteric SA, both.
Various Marantz SACD playerswho likes what [Archive] AudioShark Forums
Edit · Delete. I have an older Esoteric SACD Player and wouldn't trade it for the world. I have not heard the Esoteric but I have heard the Marantz. . Details tend to be less defined and not as pin point in the Marantz's.
Post 11 of Recording of June Music for Strings.
Post 2 of Recommended Components: Edition.
Equally by the obvious coloring of the SA10 that went before as I was with the precision, clarity, the space between notes, and openness of the CD9. The Esoteric presents a colder, more analytic sound, with more up-top air, which can come off as either an extra dollop of space, detail, and refinement, or else as a glassy skating pond, depending upon the recording.
Marantz sa11s2 vs esoteric meaning
|Members Registered members Current visitors. Jun 13, at PM. There was a revelation when switching from the Marantz to the Audio Research.
Here's a link to Audio Classics Filter 2 seems to be the worst of both worlds, LOL.
Advice on SACD player Steve Hoffman Music Forums
. My previous player was an entry level Esoteric SA10 that sounded more slender, but in.
Video: Marantz sa11s2 vs esoteric meaning Marantz SA-11S3 Review by AVLAND UK
Very important for me the CD and SACD sound was on the same high level. My Marantz SAS2, the budget reference model (if that makes sense) shares several components with the more expensive 7S1, Esoteric DV - $6k (if you need video) The Pro had a bit better LF definition as well.
Amid all the confusion arrives Marantz's new SAS2 Reference, in the greatest detail and definition, and sure enough, it tightened up the.
Likes: John Jun 14, at PM. Location: Pleasantville, NY. Post 6 of Marantz SAS2.
Marantz SA11S2 Reference SACD/CD Player Measurements
Exposure XV integrated amplifier.
Cesumar maringa site blog
|I do an order for a KXS Sorry for my english Recording of January Into the Fire.
I was honored to be asked by Yarlung Records to write the liner notes for Orion, the recorded debut of the young pianist Orion Weiss, and on which he performs works by J.
Recording of August Nielsen: Symphony No.
Pure Super Audio New Marantz SA11S2 SACD player review creates controversy
Esoteric SA universal player. I have an opportunity to acquire a Marantz SA11S1 SACD player in nice condition. if you had a choice the Marantz SACD player or a used Esoteric SA50? of my Marantz " the SAS2 features a silky-smooth aluminum SACDM -1 is more definition of the notes and the inner note silence very odd.
There was a revelation when switching from the Marantz to the Audio Research. The Esoteric has more detail and low end wallop.
like and less "full" than the CD8, but has better, more defined bass and is more clear.
It produced solid, full-bodied, well-textured images on a relatively compact soundstage. Jun 14, at AM. Share This Page Tweet.
Marantz SA11S2 Reference SACD/CD Player
I thought Marantz used modified Sony transports. John Adams.
The noiseshaping was turned off for these tests, as was the DC filter.
Marantz sa11s2 vs esoteric meaning
|I enjoyed my winter with the latter a lot, thinking that I could live with a more basic source, but, in the end, couldn't stay away from the refinement and excitement of better stuff.
These differences in level will make direct comparisons of the sounds of the filters problematic. I spoke to the Marantz folks today at their HQ in the US, and sure enough the transport for these units is no longer supplied!!
Through the Marantz, and using Filter 1 that leaves the CD signal untouched, the sound was a bit too ripe. I would also give the new Sony ES a listen before you dismiss it.